<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Folknologist - models tag</title>
  <link>http://www.folknology.com/blogs/default/tags/models/</link>
  <description>Techno group therapy</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Al</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:04:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>Successful Web 2.0 business models</title>
    <link>http://www.folknology.com/blogs/default/2007/08/29/1188379800000.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          I have been thinking about web 2.0 business models over the last few weeks and it occurred to me that there was a dearth of even anecdotal evidence pointing to successful business model implementations of web 2.0. My question is, which firms are operating in profit with a web 2.0 business model right now. Note I am not including those who have successfully sold out to larger players, I am confining my query to effective web 2.0 business model implementations, ones with ongoing profitability (sustainable). The only ones I could think of (off the top of my head) was 37 Signals and maybe EchoSign, thus I put it to you who can you add to this list, is there such thing as a successful web 2.0 ongoing business model, or am I asking the wrong question?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.folknology.com/blogs/default/2007/08/29/1188379800000.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
    
    
    <comments>http://www.folknology.com/blogs/default/2007/08/29/1188379800000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.folknology.com/blogs/default/2007/08/29/1188379800000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

