Has Google crossed a ‘content/competition’ line with it’s knol enterprise?

I always saw Google’s role as one that sat above the content of the web. I always imagined that Google was about finding content that other organisations and individuals created on the internet. Yet with their Knol undertaking they are effectively building an Adsense sponsored army to tackle wikipedia content themselves on their own network (also available on the Internet). I also wonder will all outside search engines get access to all of the information that Google has from using its tools to create the knols. Can Google say that this will not bias itself? Also should Google compete with the internet it searches, surely google should confine itself to meta data in this respect.

Also would Google have done this if Wikipedia had been using Adsense on it’s pages?

By the way I like the Knols idea, I like the idea of competition for Wikipedia, Squido etc.. I am just not sure its Google’s place to be that competitor, I am also unsure of Google’s real motives here. Has Google crossed a line here? let me know your thoughts.

* Update Umair thinks that knols will fail because Google can't build communities
(I would concur given their track record).

'Larry, Sergey, Eric - uhhhh...communities aren't tools'

He also questions the model vs wikipedia interesting.

Well Amazon have put the final piece of their cloud based jigsaw into place if you recall my take on Amazon Web services in May I indicated that the missing element was a cloud based DB store.With todays announcement (via twitter) SimpleDb enables one to build a complete cloud based web application including the back-end store and query. The query language is domain/attribute based rather than relational, but we always expected that to be the case for scalability reasons. It is now just a matter of time before frameworks (and plugins for existing frameworks) appear to make building cloud based apps as simple as say RAILS apps. In fact I would expect a RAILS based plugin to be one of the first candidates for AWS extensions. I will be looking at it from an Erlang angle and looking to build an Erlang interface (with mnesia caching) in the near future, if anyone is interested in helping on that front please let me know via Twitter/comment or email (al at this domain).

I would also like to point out that Amazon seem to be running away with cloud based computing at the moment, there doesn’t seem to be any real competition for them. I am continually surprised by this, I thought by now others would have shown their cards (yes I know IBM have talked but thats all they have done). So big Kudos to Amazon for getting this spot on and continuing their relentless delivery of features to the growing community around AWS, Congrats to Jeff and the team. 

* Update SimpleDB is actually implemented in Erlang.

I have read so much about Enterprise 2.0 over the last year I figured It was about time that I should air a nagging feeling I have had about the ‘New Enterprise’ for sometime now. I should also point out that I am not knocking those tools and services out there that pertain to be encompassed by the Enterprise 2.0 buzzword (E2.0), many of these tools like Wiki’s etc.. are ones in which I routinely engage. No this post is more about what the real Enterprise 2.0 really is, and how it has been totally hijacked by the buzzword E2.0.

I have also noticed many of the current enterprise vendors getting on the back of the E2.0 buzzword in order to make a new sale to their existing customer base, whilst at the same time making themselves appear more enterprise 2.0 (in the same way web bizs try to be more web 2.0). The thing is however, it’s not about the vendors re-inventing themselves, it’s about the enterprise being re-invented itself, its about the whole new generation of enterprises coming down the pike, these bear little resemblance to existing enterprises.

This change is not going to be small and incremental, it will be bloody and revolutionary, this isn’t about existing enterprises changing their I.T. tools. No what I’m talking about here is a whole new kind of enterprise, these organisations will become the new enterprises of the 21st century and they will be built very differently. Their I.T. will be as unrecogniseable from todays enterprise I.T. as mainframes are to mobile telephones.

‘Ok Ok I see what you are saying, very fanciful, but where is the evidence? Where are these new Enterprises?’

This is the question I have been asking myself over and over, who are they and what do they look like? Well, an enterprise is basically a large business (or organisation), often it is an international or global organisation but that isn’t required. OK heres is my first example of the emerging enterprise (EE -> E²) breed : Google!

‘What’ I hear the cries ‘Thats not fair they are an I.T. company’. Well it might not look fair and the comment is valid, but actually they are an advertising company first. The technology is a requirement in the new advertising enterprise space. The technology Google operates is a default requirement to compete in that space, just take a look at Microsoft trying to crow bar its way into that competitive landscape. ‘Yes but Google also sell their technology to other businesses aren’t they just like Microsoft?’ Actually no they are not like Microsoft because their primary business isn’t selling software/technology it’s selling advertising/attention, also there isn’t anything about being an enterprise that suggests one enterprise can’t sell to another enterprise, in fact it happens as par for the course now.

‘But isn’t Google just an exception?’ well possibly but unlikely in my opinion, if they are the exception then they will end up owning the new enterprise world. More likely however, other new enterprises will enter the fray and compete in the different sectors (including Google’s advertising sector). Google is also unlikely to sit still, it will expand into other sectors, just as enterprises do today, I don’t see that happening without resistance from both incumbents and new emerging competitors.

Thus one would do well to look at how Google operates inside and out, with the market and with their technology. There will be opportunities in many sectors for new enterprises ; Media, leisure & entertainment, health, banking & finance, engineering, retailing etc..

Google isn’t alone here are a couple of other emergent enterprises (E²) :

• Amazon in what originally was the retailing/consumer sector, although they cross over into logistics and operations.
• ebay is in the retailing/consumer sector, it’s like the new bazaar, but they are also looking to expand their influence elsewhere (Skype?)

I’m sure you can think of more.

But the most interesting thing about this whole post to me is not new enterprises we can see (Google, Amazon, ebay et al.) but rather those just emerging and those that haven’t even been thought up yet. Right now there is major disruption occurring across many different industry sectors as Umair says ‘new value creation models are there for the taking’ (I’m paraphrasing, check Umair’s blog for a complete picture). I would love to know your ideas, or pointers to emerging enterprises. This is a great opportunity to comment or post a series of fascinating what-ifs for the new enterprises.

Here is another idea, via Umair, to get your juices running : could this supersede the automobile industry model.

So when we look at the Enterprise 2.0 through the lense of the E2.0 buzzword it really doesn’t stack up, if you look at Amazon or Google’s software to operate their enterprises it looks nothing like the E2.0 characterised offerings. If it did we would just be slapping lipstick on the enterprise 1.0 pig. No to me Enterprise 2.0 is something radically different, this is not upgrade, it’s a wholesale re-invention of what it is to be an enterprise, I think the software and services that these new enterprises will require will look more like mini Googles or mini Amazons. I envisage a whole new market for vendors and service providers cropping up to satisfy such demands. It is also with some personal humour and even irony I observe IBM’s blue cloud being touted as an Enterprise EC2…

Enterprise 2.0 != E2.0

Enterprise 2.0 = E²

The real Enterprise 2.0 has now stood up or do you disagree…